May ith, 1869.
D. Monts & Ca. v. W. N. Rontxsoy.
Claim of $22,10; for Rent.
Jacob Mons, sworn, deposed:—That ho was the defendant's landlord and had let to him the ' Oriental" at $35 por month; but that under the agreement entered into between them he had the right to get sion on giving a month's notice, which he did on the 19th April. Defendant bad entered into possession on the Ist "April, and the present claim was for the rent due to the day on which the notice was to expire. Ho did not pay on the Ist May or tender any payment.
To the Defendunt—You did not tell me when made application to you: for the 19 days' rent that you would pay the entire month's rent on the presentation of a receipt.
Defendant contended that he was entitled toa notice enabling him to quit on the Ist of the month ashe had entered on the Ist, and not one compelling him to leave in the middle of a month.
It Brenken, sworn, in reply to the defendant, stated that it was he who had drawn up the agreement; He knew nothing about any oral agreements between ther Worship sustained the defendant's contention and dismissed the case. A monthly notice to determine a monthly tenancy to be good must expire on a day distant by so many entire mouths from the date of entry.
Bfay 13th, 1869.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.