In this case the plaintiff, who was a constable in the Shanghai Police Force, sues the Municipal Council, dain damages on the ground that his dismissal from the Force was wrongful and contrary to the terms of an agreement made between the plaintiff and the Municipal Council, The cause having been duly tried and considered, a majority of the Court (the Consul-General for Great Britain dissent-ug) tind that the plaintiff has no cause of acti We find that the plaintiff was dismissed by the Watch Committee of the Municipal Council, and that such dismissal wrongful, We are of the opinion that the suid Watch Committee had authority, under Regulation XXII of the Land Regu: Intions and Bye-laws for the Foreign Settlements of Shanghai north of the Yang-king. pang-andthe- Memorandum of Duties undertaken by the Watch Committee, on page 13 of the Sunding Orders of the Council and Committees, to sv dismiss the that such action ut the Watch ion of the Municipal not in violation of the
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.