Krosie any Ca. v. Sui Cut.
This wasa case which had been adjourned from the 20th inst, pending the decision of an arbitrator. Mr. Bourne ted the report of the arbitrator had been handed to the Magistrate. The defendant who claimed that the 6 cases of black Italians fendant's premises fur some window-gla which it was suspected he had stolen from a hou-e he (defendant) had formerly occupied. The detective had no warrant.
Inspector Reed said this was often done, and that he could search houses if they were suspected without a warrant. The detective had found the articles then in Court and some broken glass.
Three employees of the Ewo Mill failed to satisfactorily identify the goods, when questioned by Inspector Reed Mr. Nelson drew attention to the fact that in the warrant defendant's name was mentioned as Chen Ah-hsi, instead of Ning Al hsi, also that he was an employee of the Ewo Cotton Mill.
Wong Ching-san, the detective, was ox-amined by Mr, Nelson and corroborated Inspector Reed's statement, Cross-examined—He took the articles found in the house to the Ewo Cotton Mill to be identified and if they lind not been recognised he would have taken them to some other mill. He at hi 10. not apy SPP Te atectians took debrery sot cinene O2t aA he id nob. lLérent do eres es bog ce denied removing a box which was now ud the Magistrate said he} missing, and sai the goods immediately. The plaintiff" men-Serg. O'Keefe here stated that he sent tioned that they wished the interest on the foreign detective with the defendant from price of the woods, and arbitrator's fee to the Central Paice Station to the Yangtsohe paid by the defendant, but interest (Tis. poo station, who fanded defendant over 11) only was allowed.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.