husband had come oa* of gave. He (Attias)! This was a case in which the proprietor sail he would $24 which by right; of the Shanghai Mercwy, Mr. J.D. Clark, should belong to Heidenheimer who had sued the proprietor of the Hupuo, a dono all the work. He told lem to let vernacular daily, for copying a map of the the woman wz to the Italian Court and new extensions of the Settlement issued not give her the money. fle expected by the Mercury.
Heidenheimer would there be able to] Mr. McNeill (Dowdall, Hanson, and show how hard he had worked.
He McNeill) appeared for the defence.
(Attins) said he was a. lawyer in the Mr. Clark said he issued a plan of the Italian Court and a merchant. He said extension of the Settlement on the the woman very bat wom inst.
He had employed Mr. A. BE. ant hied the Court would not give her Algar to draw it uj and had paid him. any protection as she bad been a public He woman. He would not permit the Italian [the 7th inst., finding his sale of copies advertised the for sue, After Consulate to be dra: ged into this matter. diminish he made enquiries and found that His (Attins') name had already appeared in the Aupay was issuing exact copies of the papers but that it would not appear his plan, He gave the order to Mr. Algar
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.