This was a plaint for Tls. 39, or in ternative the return of " bedroom suite.
Both parties were present in person, and it was explained that the diepate was over two chairs. Plaiptiff bad sold the bedroom suite to defendant, and defendant claimed that the svite in-plaintiff p said it seemed to him that if these two chairs as a fact did form " part of the suite they must be returned to it, and the bargain must go trough. If they did not, the parties were never at one mind about the matter, what was bought was not bat the plaintiff thought was being bought and what wes not what el If that was 80, cancelled, the farnitare would belong to Mrs. Kuba and the defendant would not have to pay anything. They must refer the matter to someone who ovald decide whether the chairs belonged to the The parties agreed that the matter should be decided by " Chinese farnitare dealer.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.