Cross-examined by Mr. Maitland, the Prosecuting Solicitor, witness admitted one of the cheques referred in his evidence was missing but id that to his recollection this the only one that had been ed from the bank,—Witness never passed an obviously false signature and there must have been some remarkable similarity in the alleged false cheque before he passed it. Witness did not agree with land that the signature om the!
ved false cheque was a gael]
He would not like to press an opinion on the elloged signature and the one signed by Victor Elliott.
Wang Tz-yung, in charge of the Savings Department of the Amer can-Oriental Bank, sail that he both of the accused and the complainant but the alleged false cheque was not signed in his preence. Cross-examined, he said that did not sce him sign the cheque.
Mrs. Elliott—He did not know: me then, before this case came up.
Counsel then summed up, Mr. Kentwell entering a plea of guilty on behalf of the accused but appeal.
to the Court for a suspension of any sentence that may be imposed.
Arguments of the other counsel were delivered, and the case wa: then adjourned.
After the court arose, a heated argument took place between Btr. Molcomb and Mr. Fleming which necessitated in "their separation by eile of the officers of the Court,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.