In this case the claim was for $50, damages for injury done to plaintiff's bicycle by the negligent driving ofthe snd ant or his servants, M. Hoghes appeared for the and the defendant was present. that the plaintiff drove into him. It had really got nothing to do with bim, trap and any His Lordship said that if the man was not his servant, there was a difficalty, because Mr. Morriss would not then be hat Mr. Hoghes ssid that he would have to ask that the Horse Bazaar should be added. On November 8 he had written to Mr. Morriss calling his attention to the matter, stating that there was s claim fcr $50. There was no answer until after the writ was served, so that the expense of the first writ, should be against Mr. Morriss.
His Lordship—Can yon legally claim Mr. Haghes—He ought not to have accepted service.
His Lordship—If " man comes to me with a writ of Court, I am not going to run the risk of refusing to accept Mr. Hoghes—Then I will ask your Lordship to waive the foes for the other writ.
His Lordship assented, and adjourned the case until Tuesday next.
Shanghai, Nov. 27.
Before Sin Havituann pye Savauanegz, Jupox, axp Massns, R.E, Wusox, H. R. Kumar, A. G. E. Hitt axp J.B.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.