Zen Ting-dah, foreman, stated that accused wus at the Works as He saw him elf and at different times he carried the flag, the gong or the whistle, Accused paraded round the alleyway, went behind the;|housex and came on to North at all in keeping with the remainder of his anatomy Armed foreign constables stood guard at each "i of th "At the time of the erection of the fence he shouted for the people to come out, to stop the workmen from building the fence, beat them and to throw tiler from the roofs at them, This wax at the entrance of the alleyway, he used the handle of bent us." for a that the Mixed Court the police witness afraid of the [many pointe, that they would beat him. He was outside on the road by that fat the ts io riot on Mayet Avewed—slartaret that the had sone to Police Station. Sie the toad hor did Hie slain to the the better ith rebuttal Br, Brown declared that Br, Brandt owned one fourth of the property and Beas on the remutind tated that by of alleyway, oxpinye for & moment they rex hia into North Mr. Bria You took no part obstructing the building operations, a leader of the ent for this case know Tenants' on, nor one of that he was arrested in the Settle. wives did not ment executed control pal roads id. complete but represent school in: the "Association, it. Brovn—You went to the where the offence was committed.
Chinese Station with the two To the third objection that Mr. ither accused on behalf of the Brandt was not qualified to make 1 went on two a complaint counsel argued that this was a hishly technical point, and under Court procedure it was Witness then denied having any not customary for justice to he part in stirring up the men or if, whistles or heating a gong, foF he hal nei He was Mr. Whitamore said that positive that he not tell action were to he brought against tenants to throw tiles at the men the property, it would have. to be from the roofs. He further denied ed to Mr. Brandt-and forther this act even though Mr. Brown warned him that two witnesses could would give evidence that se had of a criminal 8 done so. He had been st the surely w Police Station all day. the contractor, Mr. Brown, Two other wi nesses, one of them employed at the Dollar Garage, told of seeing accused dragged the alleyway: and subsequently, Case was remended to a [future date, during which time the Bench will come to fave been pro-jhe =rw him in Tool witness that it was in at the entran the Yeo Lab the} Yee Meywey, and to a further query still maintained the same reply The Assessor—Was he in the leeway or was he in the road? lid The have one foot or both fect fon the road?—Witness answered to successive queries—at the entrance, nearly upon the footpath, I saw him come out of the alleyway; yes, T saw him outside the petition has been lodged by the wife of Dr. F.C. Tong, the Cantonese who was sentenced to a term of imprisonment some time xgo in connexion with the suicide of a young Chinese woman, for the remission jof the sentence. It will he remem-dered that following his conviction Jand subsequent appeal to the Soochow Court, Tong was accused being a Bolshevik agitator and Jcommitted to the Military Prison, Lunghva.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.