This was a claim for Tls. 2,960, damages for failure to deliver piece goods under contract.
Mr. GF. Cartis appeared on belial of the plaintiff and Mr, 8. Fesson represented the defendant, Mr. Curtis took exception to the amended verification which bad been pat. in by the defendant, and be also asked for the costs that the plaintiff bed expended up to His Honour:—Under what rale do you ask for costa Mr. Cartis:—I don't think there is any rule on the subject, but it is general His Honour:—Well I will not create' of s cause.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.