One of the objections to De. I was an interview which he ix to have given to a Chi which he ix alleged to the Rendition Naturally, the Cons} Bary could not have' support President of the Provisi ul Court, Who sets himself a inst the con n-of the Court in th On July 28, Mr, sxe, Commissioner Affairs, presented to Mr.
Cunningham, Senior Consul, the Following statement, which' hax authorized for publication in the "North-China Daily News:
"As regards the alleged interview reported in the 'Chung Yang Jib Pao,' dated Fane 80, in which "Being members of a Lawyent Association? you naturally claim have some knowledge of the Law of the Judiciary. At least, you claim' A Hittle, Your letter, however, betrays you and discredits you utterly ax lawyers, because of your weak knowledge of the law and the illegality of your actions.
Your whale letter ix provocative so deserving of paught Lut Aisa is useless fur me to ne in reply. 1 would -tike to know who is responsible for vular letter issued by the 'Lawyers Association' in order that I may show him the real law which protects both my personality and my good eharacter from such defamatory and slanderous statements as have been male. I demand a reply within three days."
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.