Without stop pi the hai J. sideration tributary ne of the plain-it's son, Johann Lott, for 2 he was guilty of contributory negligcence which would have prevented him from recovering damages from the defendant {hen it follows as a matter of course' that the plaintiff, the alleged dependent mother," would not entitled to damages on recount the death of her son.
'Wass Uhere contributory neslisgence on the part' of the deceased, Kot? The evidence she Mr, Lott undertook to perform dive that is admitted to be unde taken with a certain amount of risk. In water below six and i half wel in depth it is an extraordinary isk, even to an experienced diver Me. Lott certainly was record to the evidence of a large number of expert witnesses who testified before the Court. He was a zomparatively stranger to this pool but had been in the water for half wu that morning and it seems to 8 that even ordinary oleevation ud precaution upon his part wontd have indicated and made pla that to attempt such i dive the then present state of the wi in the swimming pool the least, dangerous in the extrens Court Finds that Me Was
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.