So effective a reply has already been given to Mr. Cubitt by other correspondents that we might
which has roused But tate to sty more on the point re still some issues that y have escaped general atter-ion, and the whole question of a to the British community and their Allies that it must not be left in an inconclusive—stage. First, however may we again emphasize that we have nothing against Mr. Figge personally, although, while it is generally recognized that he has proved himself an able councillor, it. would be absurd to suggest that there are no others who would not prove themselves as able in his place. Secondly, we are trying to express the point of view generally taken. we believe, by the subjects here of Great Britain and her Allies.
As regards the attitude of neutral voters we should not venture to offer an opinion. Tf they wish to vote for Mr. Figge, it would' be the greatest presumption to attempt to dissuade them. Tf they think that, in the common phrase, it is "had Inck™ to try to "ron inal from alt UNIVERSIT
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.