Jadgment on which hie-client sought Young, rebornning to te recover, stated that on August 21 letter in which he stated it was not
en the agreed date. The comnyunication added that defendant was doing his utmost to raise money in England, and that probably in a month's time he would be sble to pay the amount in full. He asked plaintiff to rejoin the firm of Wadham & Ca, and, provided defendant kept to his agreement, to withdraw the judgment. An agreement to this effect was signed by plaintiff. Counsel suggested that defendant had made no serious effort to keep his part of it, and that Wadham obtained the signature of Chen to the document well knowing. that nothing would be paid.
His Lordship remarked that the letter did not refer to the withdrawal of any judgment—it meant the withdrawal of a judgment summon:
At this stage Wadham again asked for a remand, reiterating that the evidence he was giving was such as would be involved in the criminal proceedings.
Three Criminal Charges His Lordship said he thought it would perhaps be the right thing to adjourn the case. It was possible that the plaintiff would desire to take criminal proceedings, in view of the other charges against defendant.
Mr. Young stated that he was seriously thinking of taking this step. There were, he intimated, three cases to be brought against Wadham on Thursday.
The case was adjourned until October 12.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.