Mr. 8. b nor Consil's Deputy, made two' protests at the Provisional Court on May 30 in eases which had come before and/on which he had reserved his Yisht to protest was convicted of an offender and was fined $500. tis jen with the ease was that hho was veiling at 7 Tongehan Road when a burglary was committed there by two others one of whom har no: bec seen since, The "ther was foun! st another address in the company of Shornvich, who had moved wine the burglary, and wie pleaded that Shoravich had given protection from the police.
The protest reads, "It is admitted that the accused received part of property from the thief. has, however, given 9 perfectly natural explanation of his actions which the prosecution ha not shown to be either absurd or in error, "LO the accused were guilty the sentence passed upon him would be Jnndequate, Tam satisfied, how that his guilt has not been proved."
The second protest was ayainst the sentence of 1 dure Hsiung on the Eh ned in the ppowsible for hi cape by opening the door of oom when the guards were smoking opium, The following day eased appeared at the Vietim's father and reward that lid been pr instend the police were callod a the man arrested, Sentence tulle ced ard the deputy reserved his right three weeks Hf he really did. fe.
peda the complainant for
iHease the complainant at the end of font he id 30 apparently (9 Tear for hineelt at the expense, of his colleagues. This woul, therer tion than an extenuation Chinese Taw for the mitted by the proscribed by therefore, protest assam
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.