The Archive · 1920

U. S. Court for China

Shanghai, Oct. 15.

Before Hon. C. 8. Lostnoter, Fudge.

R, Hanish v, Fearon, Daniel Ca, Inc.

The case was continued in which plaintiff sued to recover Tls. 70,000 damages for alleged breach of contract of employment.

Mr. Sterling Fessenden, Messrs. Jernigan, Fessenden, "Rose Holcomb, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr, R. T. Bryan, Jr., of Messrs. Fleming, Davies & Bryan for the defendant firm.

r. Walter A. B. Nichols, president and general manager of the firm was recalled and examined by Mr. Fessenden. He admitted that he made speculative purchases himself towards the end of last year but conditions in that case were entirely different to the speculations made by Mr. Hanish. He bought for sale in Europe while Mr. Hanish bought for sale in America. Witness stated that both Mr. Hanish and he had received the same instructions from New York.

Mr. Fessenden: I put it to you that you are trying to accuse Mr. Hanish of doing things you did yourself Our instructions did not apply to Europe.

Continuing, witness said that the albumen bought by Mr. Hanish was not for any special market. Mr. Hanish's speculations, said

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account