P.C.O, Rhind Ie saw the: second accused standing at the door the house where the robbery was abave been committed. He heard ring: before he got round the corner sand saw the Chinese detzetives fir: ng ata man who at once dashed back into the house. Later he saw tho} age used conv: out and make motion ax though to draw a pistol, Witness fired at hin and. missed.
He saw others on the rot of the house, but did not fire any more beeauss his ammunition wa Woo Paheduo, owner of the said that early in the morning in question a number of mien entered his house, three of whom came als bedroom. They said they 9 search fr opium, but produce their authority. vistals. "Witness saw thrive faces, could not now reeaznize did ho wsderstand thei diale: He could not say if any of the men aho entered his house toat mornin: vere in the dock, but a search after' hho attempted robbery showed that, nothing was missing. evidence rated by a Mise Tee, Chinese detective eansiable have a deseviption of raid, but!
ed to disclose the source where obtained his information that the abbey was going to take place. The Court overruled Mr. Jenaand for a proper answer.
Who exe was remanded,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.