London, Feb. 6. ai eat of the opposition, who showed The debate took place at the xe:
desire to censure ths Government for their conduct of recent negotia-Hons or for the substance of the Rew British Memorandum, but who dished to enjoin upon the Gover The'poliey enunetated in that doct= ance' of " puta ment with the greatest possible vigour, who choice was, therefore, between no reduction in armaments at Jr allot a treaty providing for some moderate and reasonable programme of abandonment of the biggest weapons by the most heavily armed powers, Germany, in her document, sumed that nobody woul Government would view "not only abandon anything. "The British but even with repugnance a settlement which pro-Vided, it might be, for full equality of Fthts but provided for i without any disarmament in any corner of the, world."
Such conclusion they would resist with all their might. The the British Memorandum vas to show how it was possible for highly armed powers, progress; sively to get rid of their heaviest Regarding effectives, the British Government, insisted on the principle of parity between France, Germany, Italy and Poland, Regarding land war materials they were prepared to accept Goi many's own proposals as to equipment of her short-service army, but it was a mistake to support that they conceded, or indeed that Ge many had suggested, authorisation of further weapons to the existing German military organisation.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.