To the Editor of the "Nonra-Cuiwa Dany News'
Sin-—With all deference 1 submit that you have been misled by Mr. Tang Leong-It and his supporters in accusing me in your editorial note of this morning, of a "slip in quotation." In my first letter 1 wrote: should welcome an opportunity of vindicating "myself in the British Court, but that, T fancy is. the last the' Chinese." Government his being' deported?
To that quotation from a contributed article Mr. Tang replies With a Quotation from a. subsequent article of his own, which Thad not but which fully contims my" state: ment. It was not a prosecution, in the British Court he advocated, but disciplinary or administrative mea-ures, such as "the cancellation of ortal "ana "cable privileges"—the Wery course of action of which my letter "complained, T'hesitate to ask your hospitality reply to Mr. "Usk" but his letter 50 characteristic of the attacks made on me by Chinese orities, that T'trust that in common, fairness you will permit me to demolish. his He states as a concrete case of my subversive activities my "urging for Japanese reinforcements for" the Shanghat War."
Taig, and am not ashamed of having' done "so, The "article in question was printed in the "Evening Post" "on adiuary 30, 1032, and opened with the" following" pa SPThe Japanese have turned from words. io action, "with of without Sidequate'sustifeation they have Dro=
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.