'To the Eaitor of the "Nowr-Cunva Dasy News'
Sin—I cannot allow your editorial, "New Path to Peace', to pass unchallenged. The irony in the title truck me forcibly when T read your advocacy of a stronger fleet, etc., for Great Britain.
It is too hot to write a long reply to your arguments, but I wish to refer to one or two. You wrote: "the only real insurance of peace lies in preparedness to make aggression unprofitable." Does that imply that you would urge China to have a huge army, navy and air fleet to preserve peace and make Japanese aggression "unprofitable"?
The other remark I wish especial ly to query is— who {deallst seeks the goal he has im mind without appreciating either the method 10 attain it, or the obstacles Ju his way to achievement.
This is a favourite argument, but it seems to encourage the fallacy that no idealist can be a realist. Two of the stoutest advocates of the Peace
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.