M, clu Pac commented upon the difference of this testimony with Bere Gane ant ut given before the Coroner, when
one metre only.
Tin his address to the Court, MIN. clu Bee de Marssulies dest wed the death of these poor children and declared that he: was not chaning the man with marder, as there wax absolute evidence that he had Kxnuwledge of the accident only after having Been the cause of it. But He would show to the Court that Ue man was eilty ence Witnesses had the barry
eedenee wae that wonky ne frame wheel upset when same others say that it wae the hack wheel, It must borne in ital that the road did not belong tithe motorist only, The ama who wax pushing the pram, ent Hot tee the footpath, on aeesunt sam fah there and Of hudders Tying apon it, Moreover the footpath was a soft. ands nie aad It was quite necessary far the anak to tine the roid ital The French By-Laws Th was no other vehicle it therefore, the ehawutfeur col quite fof the way of the pram According to the by the Frouch Municipality, that kind of Lorry baud the vigh€ to use cither side of the road and as there other age there att time, could have given Article 6 drive at a dist the curb as to The driver did not act accordingly.
Phe driver had to be expecially careful when driving a trevor drag serge a lorry of astengtit over 3 feet und brooller than the tractor itself.
The facts, were that the chauf-four, in beginning to turn to Route Pichon, did not allow rou enough for the pram, Ie ask ced the court to sentence him according to Article 1 of the Penal C anid For acting contrary to and IL of the Prench Municipal
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.