Defendants' Claim that Goods in Question Were Not up to Sample An action on a bill of exchange drawn and accepted and not paid on maturity came before his Honour Judge Sir Skinner Turner at H M. Supreme Court on Monday, plaintiffs being Messrs. Armitage Rigby & Co., Ld., and defendants Messrs James McMiullan Ca. (Shanghai), Ld. The original bill was for £1,301.10.11, of which sum £406.10.11 has been paid, £945.10.0 being now claimed, with $200 costs.
Mr. J. E, Badeley appeared for plaintiffs, *and ® BR. F.C. Master for defendants.
Mr. Badeley asked for judgment on the specially endorsed writ. The bill was presented in due course, he said, and was accepted, but was dishonoured by the Bank, in consequence of de-fondants claiming that the goods supplied were not according to sample. Counsel asked for summary judgment,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.