Court several hearings have been held in another action in which the position of the parties is reversed, ie, E. G. Hinde is plaintiff and Arvo Tuomala defendant. Plaintiff asked for Tls. 14,080.75, same being partly financial balance, it is alleged. of Tls. 4,080.75 and the remainder Tls. 10,000 for private and confidential services rendered the defendant company and Tuomala for 20 months at Sh. Ts. 500 per month. It is also alleged that defendant promised to pay plaintiffs expenses, including living as well as business after which there would be a division of profits and losses, according to an alleged verbal agreement. Defendant in his answer stated that instead of he owing money to plaintiff, if was just the reverse and he was entifled to receive $781.18 and Sh, Ts. 4,998.54. The statement is further made in the reply that plaintiff (E. G. Hinde) never denied or contested this account until defendant (Arvo Tuomala) threatened to bring on action against plaintiff unless he paid the account immediately,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.