China Loses Case Judge Milton D. Purdy on July 28 rendered his decision in the of the Republic of China v, the Merchants Fire Assurance Corporation of New York and ordered that the motion to cancel and vacate the satisfaction of the judgment in this case be dismissed with costs against the plaintiff.
The case was instituted in the name of the Republic of China by persons claiming to be dully accredited representatives of the Peking Government. The case was prosecuted to final judgment which was entered in the U.S. Court in April 23, me time there was' pending another action which had been instituted against the same defendant made by the representatives of the National Government of the Republic of China which ease was also prosecuted to the finish and judgment entered in August, 1929, in favour of the defendant, The representatives of the National Government, having been defeated, then appeared in court in behalf of the Republic of China in the Peking and moved for an order canig the satisfaction of judgment which was made and filed in May, 1928, asking for an order directing" that execution be issued against the defendant on the judgment which was entered in April, 1928, The motion was supported by an affidavit of Mr. H. D, Rodger, wherein he described himself as "the attorney of the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China.
In October, 1925, the Merchants ire Assurance Corp. of New York executed to the Chinese Government hone Administration of Wo:
1 policy of insurance where
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.