This course was not followed in the case before us, but it is now] heard to urge this It is not neces sary for me to decide if the order July 4 were made without jurisdiction. There is no daube the first part of Rule 203 is very wide. The Court may direct "in what wanner the dispute between the Jelaimants shall be tried." But the latter part seems to point clearly' to a anal in the Court making the order, which may proceed to it at once or adjourn it.
Yoeret that the Court is ded in opinion have had further opportunity discussing the "matter when T was in Hongkong, but without avail. Under the unsatisfactory system appeal at present prevailing (hi hope will shortly be at an end) my view hay to prevail. The order: of this Court will be to vet aside the judemen, of July 28 together with the order for payment out to the intift i ome. The matter referred hack to the Cour iff for payment on that evidence must bs rossed on the part of the iment to show me why after all this lapse of time the order should not now be made.
There will be no costs to t appeal.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.