In the U.S. Consular Court on July. 25, before the Commmis~ sioner (Mr. A. Krisel), "Mr. P. JOsius was the defendant lection brought by Ladow's Tavern for $255.93, said tobe due for the judgment be granted.
Defendant's defence is shortly, that the plaintiff at all times mistakes the mame and trade name as jone thing. In the whole of Russia there has never been such name us.|"Sanzetti" and the real names of the Russians can be ascertained from the Registration Office for Russians, to which it was referred to. The defendant contended that. the various books ete. produced by the plaintiff are the proof of the trade name and canna: be used as proof of name right because the for the dispute of name right and prayed for investigation and decision according to law.
Reasons:—There are the photographs, Pictorial newspapers, Hong lists asd deposit books in which the photographer's name and the man-fager's name is Sanzetti and the certificate issued by the Bureau of Public Safety of Shanghai Munipality in which it is stated that the plaintiff's name Sanzetti" available for proof of the plaintiffs allegation that his En [word "Sanzetti" is hi te name. munitions by certain. firms" in Shanghai, On July 25, in answer to th court, Mr. Ru'admitted that the prosecution were unable to pro-sh in question, Jduce any testimony which would
"Guaranteed were oF were not written on the same machine as the body of the, contract which i the subject matter of the whole inquiry, but, [counsel contended on behalf of the police, "we have proved that the fword.' "witness" was typed out. the same time as the body of the Jcontract, and that, so far as the words "guaranteed by" are' con-Jcerned, that they were typed out latter the paper had been re-set the machine Evidence "was then called to connect the first accused, Levitsky, Jwith the charge of forging the seal Jof Raphael, and in that connection the owner of the Mei Tal Printing shop gave evidence that Levitsky called and ordered a seal, exactly like the one which appeared on paper produced by him, and. which to'Mr. T. K, Woo, a Chine fosse merchant, several years agby but who last' year made an agrees ment of divorce with her husbands 'On July. 27, an application wad made by Btrs.'Woo to Judge Chow Ju' the Shanghai Special "Dist Court for a: declaration of validity, jot the divorce agreement. as. the leant. wished to. apply to.tha States Government.. for van citizenship and 23 tHe USS. Government required of her declaration bya Chinese law court {that the said divorce agreement waa alld and legal according to Chinese Taw.. 4 Dir. T. T. Loh, of Messrs, Musso, Fischer &' Wilhelm, representing the applicant, told the Court that his client was formerly an Americ jean citizen, but, by way of marri" Jage to a Chinese, became @ Chinese citizen. On August 26, 1930, cours sel stated, his client entered into fan agreement of divorce with hee husband which was filed on record with the Shanghai Special District, Court, The applicant then applied to.
Warwick, 926 (Croom 105).
Northans, 174° andy following on, 82 (Paine eight for 44).
AL Nottinghany, Yorkshire beat Notts by nine wieke 201 (Bowes seven for 80) and (Itobinaon seven for 27), 'Yorkshire, 304 for vale, declared (itelmes 183) and 93 for one. At Brighton, Sussex defeated Lai hire by' 184 rans 185 and'" 265 for ight, 60 (Tate five for 24) and '10 (Bowley live De eighteen runs, Chesterfield, Gloucester deferred
ere BO; Mitchell six and 101,
and 180 (Parker six for 64).
(Goddard eight for 10) uth, Somerset by four wickets, Somerset, 129 (Kennedy ive for 87) Hampshire, 191 (White five for 69)
"and 19% for sla, /At Clacton, Essex defeated Lancashire ug, om 140 kenneth Barnes six for 82). At Birmingham, Notts claimed first innings points from Warwick. warily "SIL for thre Natt 60 not out).
Surrey, 221 "(Sandham 113 not out)
"and 167 for three, At Maidstone, Kent defeated 11 OF. Lee 90), Sussex, 212 and 189 (J..C. White nine for 71).
Swansea, Yorkshire claimed full pointe ae the. expense of "Glamor in, winning by an Innings and 25 catia, 02 (Werty. ix for 21) Morkahire, 178 for veight, declared five for 86). five for 99)
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.