The Archive · 1935

U.S. COURT FOR CHINA

Suit Over Promissory Note Heard The case of A. L. Vainer et Al, doing business under the style and firm name of The Harbin Union of Bankers, v. Shriro Bros, (China) Lid. was twice adjourned in. the US. Consular Court when it came before Mr. William 'T. Collins, Act ing Commissioner. The—plaintiff who are Russians without extraterritorial privileges, are represented by Mr. Myron Wiener of Rodger. and Company. while the defendant is represented by Mr. J. B. Davies of Schuhl, Davies and L. E. Lurton.

The ' plaintiffs seck to recover {$923.67 on a promissory note alleged to have been made by M. Trigubot of Tientsin In favour of the defendant, and further claim that the plaintis paid"the sum of $901.87 to the defendants as holders of the note.

Court was adjourned to permit. the plaintiffs to secure a telegram, after Dart of the evidence was taken. Messors. S. L. Vainer and Joseph Drobinoff testified. When the session was resumed at 1023 am., Mr.

Wiener complained of illness and the ease was adjourned.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account