To the Editor of the "Nonrn-Cumwa Dan News, Sit,—While reading Nnwezon's otter dated August 6, which appeared in your correspondence columns to-day's paper, relating to. "Mneldents! in Hongkew, Tam going to present to him a fow questions, before answering him, so that my reply could be a more concrete and practical one, 'Are the Japanese responsible for a action given, by the Chinese Police, to a Chinese' boy who threw stone, though not deliberate, at the Japanese Dluejackets on duty?
Are the Japanese also. responsible for the detention, by the Chinese Police, of a Chinese shop-assistant on account of his Jack of attention In putting dowa an advertisement flag?
If 80, are the Chinese subject to supervision and surveillance of the Japanese authorities on matters, of Which the former are ina position to dispose?
From what Niveroy intimated fu his letter, we cannot help deducting. that he seems to hold the view that any inefdents, which may have arisen from pure in adventure should be settled there and then without even being referred to the proper authorities which have the power and the duly to investigat Am I wrong in. supposing from what he means that the Police will Jose its raison d'etre as much as anything, if his high opinion well Worthy of a Great Uloplan, holds good in the present world in which live?
He says, "In this ies the tragedy fas well as the comedy of the attitude adopted by, the Japanese Naval Landing Party." "I wish to know from him, what kind of attitude the Landing Party did take on these cases besides handing over those responsi-bie to the proper Chinese authorities for investigation.
Was this not a proper conduct on the part of any person or persons Involved in a similar incident At the time when serious cases threatening the life of Japanese re-
""Nonr-Cunva Dany News"
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.