The other matter was an_allexation that Mr, Hardman had left the me Jured man on the road, knowing that he was injured. The evidence that had been brought forward that day had made it clear that Mr, Hardman did not know that he had injured anybody in tie vicinity. The police had testified that Mr. Hardman. was very hazy about the whole affair.
Mr, Haines tald that the defendant chylously had a very hazy recolleetion of the accident and added (lat had come to the conclusion that 'Mr, "Hardmun' made no attempt to ess Mrs. Blom, but due to careless Grivingg he failed to pull up his car when he ought to have done so. He found defendant guilty of careless Ghiving under Section 12 of the Rond Mz. Measor said that the whole of the damages occurred to Mr. Hard-
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.