Shanghai, Nov. 3.
Mr, Newman stated that' he felt it to be his duty (0 inform His Lordship certain correspondence which had only recently come to his knowledge Dut! which hiad. passed before the fil ing of the petition, at a time when the petitioner was being represented by a non british legal practitioner Shanghai. After considering the cor Fespondence and. questioning the petitioner thereon "itis Lordship slated that he could come to no other conclusion than that there had been collusion atween the parties. Accordingly the petition would be dismissed SHANGHAI LAW REPORTS (continued)
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.