The Archive · 1940

Why There Was No Bill

Mr, Teodoro admitted that he had not paid his rent for September and explained that he had not received the usual bill from the company. Mr. Lurton interposed that if the company did so, it would be tantamount to an admission on their part that tenancy could continue on a monthly basis after termination of the lease. Since the company was under no obligation to rent the premises to defendant after August, Mr. Lurton added, it was natural for them not to have sent him the usual bill taken.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account