There follows thereafter in the opinion a discussion of the authotities supporting the judgment in favour of the Bank. "The question of whether or not the Bank had waived its zight to insist upon pa mont of the demand note by reason of certain compromise conversations which were alleged to Imave tukea place in Chicago inber, 1024,
the is Tongtls in fter discussing certain testimony given by Mr. Hoyt at the second trial of the acti Iudge said: "The foregoing ely testimony contained in this: te-eerd upon which the conclusion of a wi be predicated, and there stands opposed to that testi-
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.