Roberts v. Oxus.
Claim of $50; for expenses incurred in re-mooring buoy which had been carried away by the Star of China, defendant Plaintiff did not personally appear, but his bookkeeper stated that the Star of China had come in contact with the buoy and dragged it from its moorings. They had to pay $35 to the Chinese for carrying it back and they claim Tis, 10 for the firm for the use of its gear, By defendant:—The buoy has been replaced; no other ships have come foul of it during the last three months, ete ae at Dock remembered the atom of 150 yards; the veuvel had to be re moored.
vessel foulin; e@ buoy. It was dragged about By defendant:—A vessel was foul of it about two years ago and paid for the re-mooring.
Defendant stated that it was caused by the moorings ofthe buoy being slack. The vessel was at anchor Where the Harbour Master had instructed. It was likely the copper of his vessel was injured. ferred to the Harbour Master for settlement.
On the: suggestion of His Worship, the case was re-
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.