The Trustee of the estate, who brings this action, bases his claim on the grounds that the defendant, from his general knowledge of the business, must have been aware that the beer in question was not the property of the firm that the firm never gave defendant authority to remove goods from their premises without a godown order; that this was the only parcel of goods not accounted for by the godown book, and for which a wu order could not be produced, from which it was manifest that the defendant, knowing that the house was about to fail, had taken this means of partially securing himself. Under these circumstances, the trustee declines to deduct the value of the Deer from the amount owing to the defendant from the firm, and calls upon this Court to
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.