Warsaw and Ca, v. Mrs. M, L. Kixc, This was a judgment summons for the defendant to show cause why she had not paid a debt of $99.75, in compliance with the judgment of the Court made on the 15th of november Inet, Mr. SKEELS examined the defendant, who acknowledged that she had recently earned money by nursing, but instead of ying it to the plaintiffs, she had handed At over to her landlord in part liquidation of the amount she owed him for rent, She had four children in England, who were dependent upon her, and she had not been able to send money for some time, She owed other debts in Shanghai, and was willing to pay them all when she had the means, At pres-
to live upon, She had not transferred her had only, what she mute by lodgers furniture to a lodger since the judgment was obtained in November, She hiad no prospect of earning any money except by her lodgers, ber health was impaired and she was unable to work. tiffs it was urged that Ity of contempt of Court itor when they had They asked for her press on dant that she had acted very wrongly ig her landlord in defiance of the against her, and when she oboff " portion of the plaintiffs' debt. The ployment she, would have to pay Jaw compelled her to pay that first, and the order of the Court was a sufficient answer to her other creditors when they asked her for All he could do was to impress on ity of paying the could. Th
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.