Claim for Tls. 50, rent.
Defendant claimed that he had not had the premises agreed upon.
Bmer, who appeared as attorney for the plaintiff, stated that the claim was for rent for Aug. of premises 8 Honan Road, occupied by defendant asa printing office. Defendant, had been in occupation since the beginning of June, but had not yet paid rent; that for July had been sued for and judgment went against defendant by default. "The circumstances under which the dispute arose were these, Negotiations were entered into between the Rouse No. 8 Honan Road, Pending certain arties for the lease from 3ist May of the
alterations, defendant took possession on 21st May of the lower part of the premises, and of some adjoining vacant rooms on the ground floor. After about a fortnight it occurred to defendant that having the ground floor of the two houses would be more convenient than having his offices in the upper and lower floors of the front house, and witness agreed to keep this arrangement in view while looking out for a tenant to take the upper portion at arent which would adjust
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.