Shanghai, 16th February. Defore 0, N. Devxy, Esq., Consul-Generat, Acting Judicialty.
Lez Cuix-yo v. M. G. Morares, Thia was a claim for Tle, 10,000.
The plaintiff appeared personally: the fondant did not appear and filed no points of the plaintiffs Jong and rambling, The plaintiff Lee Chin-yn humbly showeth that ho is a oubject of China and that the defendant is a citizen of the That in the year 1868 the petitioner entered into ce-partnership with Ko Kawa M. G. Holmes to carry on business under the Grm of Tsingm 'Shanghai, Chefoo and Tientsin, That at the end of the settlement of business was ma profit of Tis, 17,600 was profit was then partners' int ferent per annum, 1869. the firm consigned jer to Menrs, Jardine, Matheson after 1g to hypothecate the vessel to them, they advancing to the firm the balance of the cost. In the spring of the year 1870 Messrs. Jardine, Matheson Ca, notified to the took upon himeelf, ug
000. At that time credit balance of the working of f Tie. 2,525 in the hands of matheson & Ca. and cent had to raise upon his mumm of Tls. 7,475. ring of 1881, whiler the petitioner was at his native place, Ko Kow San and M. G. Hol: sued and arrested the petitioner, cast him into prison and kept him there for six months without bringing the case for trial. The case was afterwards tried at the Mixed Court, when the firm was
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.