Shanghai, 22nd December, 1885. Before Sir Ricuarp Renwiz, Kt., Chief Tustice.
Tue Comprome p'Kscompre DE I'AR's eared for the kinson (Crown, The petition of th it d'Escompte do Pa kers, the above named plain. tiffs, chows as follows British subject merchant at Shanghai ti (E10, thousand pounds to be ma of Shanghai Syo of Four shilh penny British credits or Banke pay be ap] plaintiffs and handed by th the plaintffe and poyable four mouths! after further aproed by and betwei a With reference to satisfaction of the ensand pounds sterling, drafts approved by the Buk and accompanied by sec cially known as Documents," the of exchange at which the to vay for the said sum of £10,000 was to be Four shillings and eleven pence and fiv eighths of one penny per Ta terms of the aid agreement to be entitled to plaintiffs approved drafts for thi £10,000 in manner aforesaid at fore the end of the mouth of Jane 1835, 6.—The defendant did not deliver to the plaintiff approved drafts for the aald sum of £10,00) or any part thereof before the eud of the said mouth of June 1885, 7.—The defendant afterwards, that la to aay, in the early part of July, requested the plaintiff to allow him further time for del very of the ssid £10,000 in mauner aforesaid, and the plaintiffs consented to do #0 on the terms. that, the defendant should pay to t plaintiff interest on the sum of £10,000 from the 30th day of Jane, 1885, until delivery, at assent manded from the defendant approved drafté 8. plaintiffs eral tinies des for the said sum of £10,000 in accordance the defendant has don the 118h liciter, in reply. liciter of the drafts, wrote in manner hereinbefore appearing, The plaintiffs delta the sam of Taole hundred and Bfty-four and fifty-two (Tls. 1954.52) for lose on £10,000 at aay of rate of eight um per annum on amount due to the plaintiff on the 12th of Novetber, 1835, from the last men+ tioned date unt rt, 10.—Particuta 1954.52 have beau delivered by the plaintiffs fendant may be dei the sum of Tle, relief og the shanghai the 18th day of Novem-
1 for the plaintiff, The di wa dant to this tition la RapHary Sika Rarmakt, of No. 6, Hankow Road.
The Answer of Raphael Sidka Raphi the above named defendant, to the petition of the above named plaintiffs, Ty dnawar to the eid petition the said fondant aye us follows the defendant admire the' allegations fleet and second paragraphs of the petition.
2.—aAs regards th and fourth amount of ten thousand pot lo four mouths alter sight penn} regards the allegation of the petition the defentaut was by the tera of the nit hereinbefore referred to entitled to to, oF any part def the said month of June, 5.—Ae regarde the niu the seventh paragraph of th mouth of Juno it was plaintiffs and th defendant sheld hay consideration that the plaintiff
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.