Lao Am-sntxe v. Stockwrt.
Plaintiff, a tailor, claimed from Mrs. Stockwell the sum of $97.27, for goods supplied:
defendant denied her indebtedness, saying she had paid the bill in two sums for which she produced receipts.
Plaintiff put in another bill, saying that it represented a different account.
Defendant courended that the triier was trying to make a squeeze," and said that twice before he had told her not to trouble about receipts.
After a good deal of discussion, His Honour said he would adjourn the case till Friday next so that plaintiff could produce his bills in proper order. He also recommended Mrs. Stockwell to have the accounts examined, ax in their present state it was extremely difficult for him to decide. If the plaintiff did not produce a perfectly clear account, His Honour suid he would not go into the matter.
Cuorenmatt v. Rose.
Chotermall & Ca., Indian merchants, of Broadway, proce ded against G. Rose to recover the sum of $57.50 for goods supplied.
defendant did not appear and, service of summons faving been proved, judgment was given for the plaintiffs.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.