In this case the plaintiff claimed $70, for board and lodging for one month from December 14, 1907.
Mr. J.C. E. Douglas, who appeared for the plaintiff, said that the defendant went to live at Mrs. Barclay's boarding-house on December 14 and left on December 23 without giving notice, The defendant stated his reasons for leaving the boarding-house without giving notice, but His Lordship held that these were not sufficient to justify defendant in breaking the contract.
Judgement was given for the amount claimed, with $25 costs and Court BARCLAY 0. W. KINCHILA, was a claim for $85 for board and lodging for one month from Deo-ember 8, 1907.
Mr. Douglas, for the plaintiff, said that the defendant came into Mrs. Barclay's houeo on December 8 and left_on December 23 without giving notice.
Tu this case also, His Lordship held that the reasons given by the defendant for leaving without notice did not justify him breaking the contract.
Judgement was given for the amount claimed, with $25 costs and Cogrt fees.
MAN GINOM p. BELA si¥oH, In this case plaintiff sought to recover $11.50, money alleged to have been lent by him to the defendant; the defendant counterclaimed $100, money alleged to have been lent by him to. the plaintiff.
Sikh Granthi.
December for the appearance of the beattog bad been adjourned from
His Lordship, addressing the Granthi, said that Sikhs were in the habit of coming to that Court and swearing on their sacred books to lies. In this case the plaintiff alleged that the defendant owed him $11.50 and the defendant swore that he had never borrowed geo. but that the plaintiff owed him
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.