R. v. Caner This was the resumed hearing of the above-mentioned case, defendant having been remanded on bail since the 2ist ult.
Mr. Pintt (Crown Advocate) nyain eon ducted the prosecution, avd) Mr. D. MeNei!l (Messrs. Dowda'l, Hanson and McNeill) appested on behalf of defendant, Dr. Karl Westphal, surgeon in the ath Compiny, Enst Asintic Infantry Regiment, stuted chat Peiho, the man who was weunded, was not vit ina fit condition 10 come to Court and give evidence. It would not be xnfe for him te com less than two weeks. There would by 1 any ong coming to the ho pital and taking his evidence there.
Mr. MeNeill—I have no questions to put to witn Mr. Platt—I suggest, Sir, that we go to On nest day do yo a wish to take the mun's evidence 7 Mr. Pl.tt-Can we not acttlo the day later 7 His Worship—Very well.
What remand yon ask for?
Mr. McNeill: The remand should be until the nee of the man in hospital is taken His Worship—There will be a remand for 14 days, with the same hail.as b fore.
Shanghai, 6th December.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.