Shanghai, 11th November. Before J. C. E, Dovaras, Esq., Acting Assistant Judge.
Wanuosatt v. Panoomatt Bros.
This case, adjourned from Tuesday last, was resumed.
D. Tolla Ram, who took off his shoes before going into the witness-box, was called by plaintiff.
Honour said that it seemed that tiff had left the employ of d ants. 'The question he had to decide was whether ho was entitled to leave dofondants' employ. If the witness know anything about the contract his Honour wanted to hear it.
Witness said he was manager of Messrs. Chotirmall's business. He did not know anything about the contract, which was made in Hyderabad. Witness was told by plaintiff that he did not get proper food and had asked for his passage back to India, but defendants refused to pay it. He did not know where plaintiff lived, bat sometimes he came and had meals wit" him. Witness had four mon in his er ploy and did not want any more. Ple Si told him he was abused and given bad food.
U. N. Toorathdas said that came and asked him to see det' ondants' manager, and settle up his ace him, and ask witness to give hi aunts for sage back to India. Witness m his pas-the manager who said he we went to see and finally asked witness uld not pay, enough not to speak toto be good about it. him any more Defendants' manager three employees who: _—said that he had got into s league
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.