the plaintiff claimed th sum of $104 for clothing supplied during the month of October, 1905.
Mr. F. M. Brooks, who app the plaintiff," said there had originally been two distinct claims, but to avi multiplicity of suits the smaller had been transferred to the plaintiff for valuable consideration. During October the plaintiff made at the defendant's order a silk evening dress. He supplied all the materi jabour and the dross fitted satis accepted by the defendant. Application for payment had been made several times, but the bill had not been paid.' The second part of the claim was for a hat, muff and coat for a The 0 been del and accepted, but payment of the bill had been refused.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.