gave judgment This action for rent coald and should een settler! out of Cour ince in ite essential elements the virtue of compromise agreement was indicated. It appeara from evidence that neither party is certain whether notice of vacation of the rooms was given and received, inasmuch as that feature of the business relations was transacted by Chinese employees.
The notice of vacation of tenancy given by the defendant was certainly not in accordance with good custom, and perhaps not of law, although in the absence of any written or express agreement to that effect, the mut collector Tt must the subse the defendant had vacated the premises the matter could then have been easily adjusted. It is very hard to understand the action and' the intent of either party, but on the principle of equal fault being presumable, if not shown clearly, a compromise judgment soams entirely proper. The defendant admits a debt of Tls. 200 or rent to Ist February 1905; the plaintiff claims Tis, 500, rent to Ist May 1905, Judgment given the plaintiff in the sum of 300 and each party is to pay his o costs made in this case,
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.