5.—That thereafter on the 30th day of May, 1906, the Russo-Chinese Bank made claim against said plaintiff for the sum of Ta 74.50 charges, regard to the cargo warranty signed plaintiff' has called upon midauts to ud settle eaid claim, but defendanta have failed refused 80 to "lo.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment ist the dofendanis for the sun of Taels 12,007.05, together with intereat and the costs of this act Mr. Lamme be wished to file the following Comes now the defendant, Geta-Bros, demurs to the plaintiff's i for cause of de-action against it, thi Wherefore this defendant prays judgment.
His Honour ssid the demurrer would be overruled and counsel given till the 5th of July in which to file to the petition.
Mr. Lamme objected to the ruling of the Court.
His Honour said the objeoti would be noted. The answer must 0 filed by the dth of July.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.