Decision in Tientsin Case Judgement was published on Mon. day by the Hon, C. 8. Lobingier, judge of the U. 8. Court for China, in the case in which Messrs. Fearon Daniel & Ca., Inc., sued R. ¥. Hall Daniel & Ca., Inc. sued R. Y. Hall for an order restraining the defendant from engaging in the paint business in China, pursuant to the terms of a contract for service entered into between the parties.
At the hearing in Tientsin, Mr. R. T. Bryan appeared for the plaintiffs and Mr. E. P. Allen for the defendant.
His Honour's Judgement was as follows On May 15, 1918, the parties to is cause entered into a written contract by which plaintiff employed defendant for a term of three years in the capacity "of a technical paint man for the furtherance of their paint business in China" defendant undertaking thereby. that he would "not as the expiration of this contract, and for a'
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.