His Lordship—In which case they would not be able to plead successfully that they were only agents for somebody else?
Mr. Harris—They would be protected, in such an event, if the name of their principal had been disclosed. If the name of the principal is not disclosed, they can be held responsible.
Counsel went on to say that, having accepted this lease, entered into possession, and paid rent. under it, defendant had no right to say it was not a proper lease. No attempt had been made by the defence to prove that the lease was other than properly—executed. Finally, counsel submitted that plaintiffs had a right to sue, and' that two breaches of the lease had been proved. Even if it were held that the first breach had been waived, the second certainly had not, and therefore, upon the terms of the lease, the Lessors had right of re-entry, with consequent right to ask for an order for ejection and mesne profits as from the date mentioned.
His Lordship reserved judge-" ment.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.