Another Argument in U. S. Court]
Mrs, Alice Rude Haifen, second] intervener in the cause of Emil 8. Fischer Qharles Stone, re} deci presented by Mr. A. 8. Allan on Monday applied to the American Court to confirm the sale off conte. '0- Bae Te was stated by Mr. 0, 8, Franklin, attorney for plaintiff that the Marshal, according the Court's judgment and " the agreement by parties concerned, had sold the lot at a private sale) and "realized © amounts to cover judgment, Tle. 10.000 plus interest from' February 23, 1930, for Mr. Fischer and is." 10,000 for the first intervener, Mr. Woo.
Mr. J.B, Davies for Mr. Woo, said that hi would be willing to pay a higher price for! the property than had been! scoured; as a matter of fact he} would offer then and there in Court Tis, 40,000 for it and per haps a little more.
Mr. Allan contended that in} the agreement there had been stipulation og to the price: agreed] upon, there had been a_general consent on the part of all concerned to sell at w private sale.
My. Franklin argued that the alo had been in accordance with the etipalations of all concerned and that ax the right to. appeal had not been taken within 60 days nothing further could bo} done in the matter, farther that hho wanted interest on his client's! share from the time of sale until amount due was actually paid to him.
The disposition of the. money from the sale and the interest claim waa agreed to by the attorappearing.
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.