The Archive · 1912

Zee Yung-yun v. Ivy Dairy

The plaintiff's claim is for 8100 for bean cake supplied between July 3 and 31.

Moores, representing the defendant, said that the reason why ceed the money had not been paid w: because an inferior cake was supplied. The plaintiff supplied cotton need cake instead of bean cake, and it was of an inferior quality. The matter was the subject of a petition be adjourned until of that Court had bec-

In reply to His Lordship, defendant's representative said he was an assistant at the dairy, which was kept by his mother. Tt was not a company, but a private business.

His Lordship amended the writ by substituting the mame of Christina Moores for the Ivy Dairy Com- Po pany.

Plaintiff said he did not know about the case in the Mixed Court.

Defendant's representative said the case had been adjourned and security had been given to appear as soon as the court re-opened. Should lone the case they would be wil to pay the 8100, though they had suffered heavy damage.

His Lordship—You undertake to pay the 8100 if the decision in the Mixed Court goes against your Defendant—Yes.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account