The Japanese papers, h editorially commented upon. the Chinese boycott in Japan, but the. Japan almost certain that tops are premature, that before any popular taken every diplo resource for, redress must' be exhaissted; In this case diplo not bon exhausted, the question pending, diplomatically, and,' besides, 9 oxcollont, reasons for believing thi -tho, American Goveriment is volun" tarily adjusting the vexed point at issue:
The "Japan Advertiser," an "American 7 pathy with the Chinese in the stand while expressing the utmost
they have taken and: welcoming, the. manifest dawn of.the spirit, of unity/and patriotism, says that it is quite another question as to the. wisdom or policy of the special method, The supreme and most ' convincing argument against itis, however, its utter futility in view of the fact that in short months the injustice' compl of is sure to be remedied. Nothi more certain th meets, the leaders in this, shortsighted policy in counting their gains and® contemplating their losses will bitterly regret that they did not leave the correction of their grievance to the simple, helpful, avd speedy. influence of time.' The {Japan Herald," s German organ, adniits that to moot force with force was. only natural and that it will effectually open the eyes of the Chinese to the power they can exercise on the 'Governient of their country. It hopes. that, the Chinese' will wake good rise. of the opportunity. The Hor that: the present. boycott audwer. to the. penalising'-legis the United States, but is also protest thie weakness: of the' Chities its, ratio to be legislated against by a country with
Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.