The Archive · 1926

Was 8. Rakusen a Partner?

On cross-examination Mr. Newman questioned the witness at length jon whether he could be reasonably sure that Mr. S. Rakusen had any connexion with the defendant firm. [Witness declared throughout that he had 0 reason to believe that Mr.

Rakusen was not acting for the defendants in London.

During re-examina said that ship in the defendant firm. In an-ister to his Lordship, witness sai that he had never had occasion to} telegraph to the London house of the defendants.

Mr. Newman then asked for an} adjournment in order that he might prepare his case, having taken it at ithe last minute.

The case was then adjourned for hearing on Monday, November 15.

Text read from the printed page and cleaned; old type leaves the occasional error.

Your account